In this article, we use so-called affiliate links. With every purchase through these links, we receive a commission from the merchant.
All relevant referral links are marked with . Learn more.
How safe and comfortable are affordable road bike helmets compared to the top models? We wanted to find out and compared 26 helmet models in the largest laboratory test that TOUR has ever carried out.
Add bookmark
This article was first published in August 2020 and was revised in June 2024.
Overview: 26 road bike helmets from 80 to 320 euros in the TOUR test
New materials and technologies make bicycle helmets safer - as shown by TOUR's crash tests. Safety technologies such as MIPS and the like measurably reduce the risk of concussion by giving the head additional rotational freedom in the event of an oblique impact. Expensive helmets often have such features and therefore perform better on average than cheaper helmets. However, advanced technology is also occasionally found in cheaper helmets. Our test also shows that the current standardisation is outdated.
Photo: Matthias BorchersThe cheapest helmet with mips is the Specialized Echelon II Mips for 90 euros.
How much more safety do Mips & Co. offer?
For the first time, we were able to measure the protective effect of mips and co. in an elaborate, innovative test procedure and, based on this data, objectively determine which helmet provides better protection than others. In the overall ranking, the expensive helmets come out on top, even in a direct pair comparison between manufacturers, the more expensive model is usually better, but the cheaper model also wins four times.
Most read articles
1
2
3
4
5
6
Photo: Matthias BorchersThe most expensive helmet with mips is the Giro Aether Mips and costs 320 euros
The helmet is placed on an aluminium test head weighing 4.9 kilograms, and the straps and headband are closed according to the real model. Butyl pads imitate the flexibility of the scalp. During the simulated fall, the helmet and head are guided on a sled and hit the ground at an angle of 45 degrees at a speed of 21 kilometres per hour. The road represents in the test setup is a steel surface covered with 40-grit sandpaper to imitate the roughness of the asphalt. We proceed analogue to the test facilities at Mips, Virginia Tech and various research institutes.
Photo: Kerstin LeichtThe helmeted test head, shortly before the lateral impact on the inclined impact surface.
We test at least two samples of each helmet. In the first run of the Safety tests In the first test we hit the helmet on the forehead, in the second on the side. Acceleration and induced rotation caused by the impact on the slope are measured and recorded. The mean value from four measurements is given; this accounts for 25 per cent of the final score. After the test, the helmets mostly show cracks and occasionally small chipped areas. Structurally, however, the helmets all remain intact and some barely show any signs of the crashes. Internally, however, they are damaged. Occasionally, we had helmets hit the same spot several times. The protective effect becomes weaker each time.
The Ventilation we test with a wind machine. The heated, helmeted head is exposed to the airflow and we determine the cooling capacity in watts. This accounts for 20 per cent of the final score, as does the weight of the helmet.
Practical test
We systematically assess the strap system and headband according to a variety of criteria in terms of function and handling, with each point contributing 10 per cent to the rating. Several TOUR testers carry out the fit and practicality check.
Conclusion: Very light, sizes overlap, relatively short construction, width adjustment is integrated into the top of the helmet shell, large pigtail recess
Lazer Blade+
Photo: Matthias BorchersLazer Blade+
Price: 100 Euro
Country of production: China
Weight (58 cm), colours: 285 grams, 6 variants
Sizes: 50-54, 52-56, 55-59, 58-61, 61-64 cm
Extras: none
Fit tendency: Allround, short
Measured values: 90 watts / 0.39 / 135 g
Rating:
Security rotation (15 %): 3,0
Safety Shock absorption (25 %): 3,7
Cooling (20 %): 2,3
Weight (20 %): 2,0
Headband (10 %): 2,0
Belt system (10 %): 1,7
Overall grade (100 %): 2,6
Conclusion: Very short and can pinch on the forehead and back of the head, but many overlapping sizes, weak impact protection
Conclusion: Significantly heavier than the top model, only two sizes available, good safety and very well ventilated, belt guide leaves room for the ears
Conclusion: Helmet shell relatively short and wide, as with the expensive model, be sure to try it on, good impact protection, satisfactory in rotation
Matthias Borchers is an expert for clothing and accessories in the test department of TOUR. As an amateur cyclist, he has completed the TOUR-Transalp and the TOUR-Trans Austria. His reportage trips from San Francisco to Sakai and 17 trips to the Tour de France with around 30,000 motorhome kilometres are also formative.