Robert Kühnen
· 25.04.2025
In this article, we use so-called affiliate links. With every purchase through these links, we receive a commission from the merchant. All relevant referral links are marked with . Learn more.
Speedster versus all-rounder, block tread versus diamonds. 2 Maxxis tyres in a test duel: can the Rambler convince despite the thicker block tread? And: How do the two tyres perform on road and gravel?
Do the diamonds and ribs in the centre of the Reaver profile provide some grip? Perhaps. But on our test track, the tyre slipped in the tricky places. But it's still fun, because it steers with agility. And when the gravel motorway is reached, it rolls. This is also confirmed by the rolling resistance test, in which the Reaver comes third behind the high-flyers from Schwalbe and Conti. The Taiwanese have obviously used a slightly less fast rubber compound than the Germans. In dry conditions, the lightweight tyre is a good choice. The cut resistance is not outstanding, but okay, and the sealing is very good.
The fine block profile of the Rambler grips better, allowing you to get through the slippery sections on our course more accurately, and it also grips better on gravel. The Rambler hardly rolls worse than the Reaver on gravel, but the difference is slightly greater on the road. The Rambler is definitely the more versatile tyre and even more of a racer than a hiker. The workmanship of the tyres is very good, they look really good up close and hold their air straight away. However, the cores are cut a little wider, and an air pressure shock is required for tubeless mounting.
All tests were carried out independently by manufacturers using their own methods. The rolling resistance test on level ground should be emphasised. We can also measure on gravel and see that a thicker tread adds power. As a "road" for the rolling resistance test, we choose a rough surface that interacts with studs and shows which rubber compound works efficiently.
The test criteria were weighted as follows for the evaluation: