TOUR Tech Briefing“The fastest aero bike is the key to success in Paris”

Robert Kühnen

 · 26.07.2026

TOUR Tech Briefing: “The fastest aero bike is the key to success in Paris”Photo: Getty Images / Anne-Christine Poujoulat/AFT
The weather forecast for the final in Paris is for cloudy conditions, a maximum temperature of 24 °C and a 10 per cent chance of rain
​The final stage of the 2026 Tour de France is just around the corner. Victory or defeat on the roads of France will be decided not only by the riders’ legs, but also by their kit. The TOUR Tech Briefing for Stage 21.

The final stage follows a similar format to last year’s. After a gentle warm-up, there will be a few final laps in Paris, during which the riders will have to tackle the narrow, steep Montmartre hill three times. So, following a gentle start to the stage, we can look forward to some thrilling action to round it off.

A last chance for teams that haven’t managed to score any points so far? Will the sprinters hold their own, or will a solo rider break away on the final climb, as Wout van Aert did last year? Or will Tadej Pogacar be the one to cross the finish line first in Paris? In principle, the stage profile would suit him too.

The city circuit promises a classic atmosphere. Anything is possible – from a puncheur’s solo breakaway to a sprint from a depleted group.

The profile reveals little about the difficulties of the final stretch. The Montmartre hill, which is expected to be the decisive factor in the selection, is just a tiny bumpPhoto: A.S.O.The profile reveals little about the difficulties of the final stretch. The Montmartre hill, which is expected to be the decisive factor in the selection, is just a tiny bump

​We’re simulating the final 10.2 kilometres of the race to analyse who has the best cycling technique for the Tour’s final stage.

Number of the day: 2 seconds

The result comes as no surprise. The fastest Aerobike in the field is, in the final in Paris too, the machine most likely to secure victory following an attack on the Côte de la Butte Montmartre: Two seconds On paper, the Van Rysel RCR-F Pro is ultimately in the lead.

However, it should be noted that when it comes to attacking directly on a climb, the Cervélo S5 is the better bike because it is significantly lighter.

If you want to defend a lead right to the finish line, you absolutely must have your aerodynamics under control. The calculated average speed, taking the gradient into account: 48.2 km/h.

The anticipated finale is just as fast-paced as the Tour de France itself.

An overview of the (almost) full line-up*:

The order of the riders during an attack on the final ascent of the Côte de la Butte MontmartrePhoto: Robert KühnenTabeThe order of the riders during an attack on the final ascent of the Côte de la Butte Montmartre

​The order of the bikes during an attack on the final ascent of the Côte de la Butte Montmartre reflects what the entire Tour de France was all about: pace, pace, pace. Aerobikes dominate the rankings. The race to develop even faster bikes will therefore continue unabated.

Thanks for reading – we’ll see you again at the press briefings for the Tour de France Femmes, starting on 1 August. What are you particularly interested in? Drop us a comment.


​* Simulation calculations

Based on our own wind tunnel tests, we carry out simulation calculations for the Tour de France tech briefing. How TOUR tests: Aero road bike test in the wind tunnel.

We are investigating which wheels can offer a technical advantage in which situations. The variables we can control in the simulation include wheel weight, rider weight, the inertia of the wheels, the drag coefficient, the rolling resistance coefficient and the efficiency of the drivetrain.

To model ride times, we use realistic power outputs and weights for the riders, combine these with our wind tunnel data, and have the riders race virtually along selected sections of the route, which we extract from the official route data; the derived elevation profiles are key to this. The modelling also includes bends, which we can brake for realistically, and adjustable power profiles for different types of riders. This allows us to distinguish between hill climbs and proper final sprints. Taken together, this makes the simulation very realistic. What we cannot replicate are dynamic handling effects such as the individual behaviour of the wheels on different surfaces.

The journey times calculated for the sections of the route that are decisive for the race highlight the influence of the wheels – provided that the riders always behave in the same way in a given scenario.

Share article:

Robert wurde 1964 in Düsseldorf geboren und fuhr seine ersten Straßenrennen mit 17 Jahren. Zum Spitzenrennfahrer reichte es nicht, aber zu späten Nischenerfolgen. 2011 gelang es Robert, Zeitfahrweltmeister der Journalisten zu werden. Nach seinem Maschinenbaustudium in Essen führte ihn sein Weg bereits 1993 zur TOUR, wo er anfangs mit der Legende Hans Christian Smolik zusammenarbeitete. Heute ist Robert freiberuflich für TOUR und BIKE unterwegs, mit den Schwerpunktthemen Aerodynamik, Messtechnik und Entwicklung neuer Prüfmethoden. Motto: Geht nicht? Gibt‘s nicht. Robert berät auch die Radindustrie und Profiteams, coacht Athleten und kümmert sich um den Radsportnachwuchs. Als Radsportler mag es Robert kurz und schnell, auf schmalen wie auf breiten Reifen.

Most read in category Professional - Cycling