Bike testAero versus lightweight construction - 20 top racers in a big comparison test

Unbekannt

 · 12.01.2018

Bike test: Aero versus lightweight construction - 20 top racers in a big comparison testPhoto: Ronny Kiaulehn
Aero versus lightweight construction - the big test
Aerodynamics or lightweight construction - which is the better road bike? We compared the top bikes in each category from 10 manufacturers.

Minimised weight or outstanding aerodynamics - two concepts that attempt to explore the limits of physics. Which approach is better? To find out, we tested one aero model and one weight-optimised model from each of ten manufacturers in the wind tunnel, laboratory and in practice.

Simulation: Which wheel is faster?

To make the interplay and interaction of weight and aerodynamics tangible, we calculate the riding time for a distance of 100 kilometres with three different profiles: Flat (500 vertical metres), undulating (1,000 vertical metres) and mountainous (2,000 vertical metres). To do this, we have to make some assumptions: Only the wheel weight and air resistance are taken into account, other aspects (such as rolling resistance, slipstream etc.) do not play a role. We assume a rider weight of 75 kilograms, a constant pedalling power of 200 watts and a sitting position with a brake grip. Although the results are of a more theoretical nature, they provide a good opportunity to categorise the relevance of aerodynamics and weight.

  The fastest and slowest wheels with a flat profile.Photo: TOUR Magazin The fastest and slowest wheels with a flat profile.

The results show that the aero model is the faster bike in almost all cases. Exceptions: In the case of Specialized and Look, the very clear difference in weight between the models is noticeable on the mountainous profiles, and in the case of Pinarello, the almost identical aerodynamics of the two bikes. All-rounders are the comparatively light aero racers such as the Trek Madone and the Canyon Aeroad, which hardly lose any time on the mountainous course compared to even lighter bikes.

  The fastest and slowest wheels with a wavy profile.Photo: TOUR Magazin The fastest and slowest wheels with a wavy profile.

At the bottom of the rankings are models that are designed as lightweight racers, but which lose this advantage by being equipped with disc brakes and can make up less ground compared to the aero specialists - such as the Scott Addict Disc, Merida Scultura Disc, but also the less aerodynamic Lapierre Xelius SL with a good 6.8 kilos.

  The fastest and slowest wheels with a hilly profile.Photo: TOUR Magazin The fastest and slowest wheels with a hilly profile.

All wheels, all times

The following table shows the simulated driving times for all 20 wheels - based on the three different terrains:

  Simulation of journey times for three differently profiled routes. Assumptions: Rider weight of 75 kilograms, constant pedalling power of 200 watts and sitting position in brake handle position.Photo: Robert Kühnen Simulation of journey times for three differently profiled routes. Assumptions: Rider weight of 75 kilograms, constant pedalling power of 200 watts and sitting position in brake handle position.

As an additional service, you will find the resistance curves of the wind tunnel test of all tested bikes here.

Canyon Aeroad SLX 9.0 LTD
	Aerodynamics: 211 watts
	Price: 8000 Euro
	Weight: 6.6 kilos
Photo: Ronny Kiaulehn

You can read the full article with all the bikes from Canyon, Cervélo, Giant, Lapierre, Look, Merida, Pinarello, Scott, Specialized and Trek in the February issue of TOUR. Here you can download the Order the magazine conveniently online.

Share article:

Most read in category Latest news