Carbon frame

Unbekannt

 · 22.03.2010

Carbon framePhoto: Daniel Kraus
TOUR's latest carbon frame test sets a new milestone: for the first time, we tested three different sizes of 27 frames. The exciting question: Can the manufacturers maintain their quality standard across all sizes? The answer is provided by the test results of a total of 80 frames.

Winning a TOUR test ennobles every bike and every frame. Accordingly, manufacturers endeavour to do well here - especially in the carbon frame test, the industry's most important test of the year. But does the test result for the analysed frame actually apply to all other frames of this type? To find out, we have always requested three identical frames from all manufacturers in recent years in order to minimise the risk of prototypes made specifically for this test being foisted on us. We were able to minimise the risk, but not eliminate it.

That's why we changed the requirement: In addition to the usual test size, the manufacturers should also send us the largest and smallest available frame height of the model. This should not only be a handicap for prototypes, but also provide answers to exciting questions: Is the very stiff 56 frame still stiff in size 64? Is the comfortable model in XS also comfortable? Does the successful geometry of a frame also make sense for the smallest and largest models? Before finding the answers to these questions, the TOUR testers went through a six-week measurement marathon in which we measured and evaluated 80 different frames - one manufacturer does not offer a larger model than the standard test size - in detail.

SHORT & SHORT

Canyon, Storck and Specialized are once again at the forefront of carbon frame construction in 2010, with Red Bull a second German mail order company in the top five. The record for lightweight construction will not be broken, but the topic of comfort is becoming increasingly important for manufacturers.

How do you like this article?

Addendum

In the carbon frame test, the middle of the three tested "Serum" frames from Simplon was specified as a 55 mm frame. In fact, it was a 58 mm frame. In the big bike test special with 60 bikes in the April issue, we unfortunately made a mistake when calculating the equipment ratings for some of the bikes. The rating of the following bikes has therefore changed by a tenth in each case. We apologise for the errors.

You can find the test results of these models in the PDF download below:

Beone Raw

Bike-Tech BT941

BMW Teammachine SLR01

Cannondale Super Six

Canyon CF SLX Evo

CKT 369

Corratec CCT Pro

Endorfin Carbon SL

Fuji SST 1.0

Giant TCR Advanced SL

Haibike Affair RX

Il Diavolo Black Venus

Kuota cult

Merida Scultura Evo Team

Moser 333

Orbea Orca

Parlee Z5

Poison Nitrogen

Principia Revolution Integral C40T

Red Bull Carbon X-Lite

Scott CR1 SL

SDC FR 708

Simplon Serum

Specialised Tarmac SL3

Stevens SLC Team

Storck Fascenario

Trek Madone

Trenga De KSR

  testing grounds: All frames were subjected to a 100 per cent test in the TOUR test laboratory. Steering head stiffness is a measure of riding stability.Photo: Markus Greber testing grounds: All frames were subjected to a 100 per cent test in the TOUR test laboratory. Steering head stiffness is a measure of riding stability.  Compliant: The effect of BMC's "Teammachine", which is designed to maximise comfort, is clearly visible on the TOUR comfort test bench. Compliant: The effect of BMC's "Teammachine", which is designed to maximise comfort, is clearly visible on the TOUR comfort test bench.   One model, three sizes: Here you can see very clearly that most road bike frames grow in height rather than length with increasing size. One model, three sizes: Here you can see very clearly that most road bike frames grow in height rather than length with increasing size.

Downloads:
download

Most read in category Buying advice