TestThree smart trainers in direct comparison - smart trainers from Elite, Tacx, Wahoo and apps put to the test

Matthias Borchers

 · 09.03.2016

Test: Three smart trainers in direct comparison - smart trainers from Elite, Tacx, Wahoo and apps put to the testPhoto: Markus Greber
Roller trainers with direct drive and electronics in the TOUR test
Rollers were yesterday: New indoor trainers with more electronics promise more successful training. We subjected three devices from Wahoo, Elite and Tacx to a comparative test for the first time.

Unlike on the road, the cyclist's experience when training on the roller is, shall we say, monotonous. Instead of enjoying the passing landscapes, you stare at a wall for hours on end; instead of a fresh breeze, you suck stuffy air into your lungs; no wind caresses your ears, but the monotonous sound of the roller drills into your consciousness. The only thing missing is that the tyre slips during the next sprint interval, your legs kick into the void and you almost fall off your bike. And because this is bound to frustrate even the most disciplined cyclists sooner or later, many roller trainers end up gathering dust unused in the attic or end up as bargains on the adverts market.

If the advertising messages from Elite, Tacx and Wahoo are to be believed, the new devices, sometimes referred to as smart trainers, sometimes as power trainers, are likely to be much more popular. One thing in particular speaks in favour of this: the direct drive. The racer is clamped into the device with the rear wheel removed, the chain drives the sprocket set and thus the programme-controlled trainer. This makes the ride feel much more realistic on all devices and allows for much more precisely controlled training than conventional roller trainers. Elite and Tacx specify a maximum possible pedalling resistance of around 2,000 watts, while the KickR brakes its rider with up to 1,550 watts. These are values that qualify all three devices for real sprint training, which is not possible with conventional roller trainers.

To provide the desired resistance, the three candidates use different braking technology. An adjustable hydraulic turbine works in Elite's "turbo mill"; in the KickR from Wahoo, the cassette drives a pulley that transmits the leg power to a flywheel weighing around six kilos via a toothed belt. Tacx, on the other hand, completely dispenses with mechanical components and uses an eddy current brake with controlled magnets.

How do you like this article?

You can find the entire article and the test results of these smart trainers and apps as a PDF download below:

- Elite Real Turbo Muin B+ (Correction due to measurement error->)
- Tackx Neo Smart 12800
- Wahoo KickR
- Elite My E-Training App
- Tacx Cicling App
- Wahoo Fitness App

Elite Real Turbo Muin B+
Photo: Matthias Borchers
Before the app and trainer can communicate, you have to select and mark the right trainer from a huge selection. Only then can the pairing process begin
Photo: Screenshot
  You can find all the articles in this issue in TOUR 12/2015: <a href="http://www.delius-klasing.de/zeitschriften/TOUR+12%2F2015.215696.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Order issue-></a> <a href="https://itunes.apple.com/en/app/tour-das-rennrad-magazin/id698586715?mt=8" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">TOUR IOS app-></a> <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.pressmatrix.tourmagazin&hl=de" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">TOUR Android app-></a>Photo: Markus Greber You can find all the articles in this issue in TOUR 12/2015: Order issue-> TOUR IOS app-> TOUR Android app->

Downloads:
download

Matthias Borchers is an expert for clothing and accessories in the test department of TOUR. As an amateur cyclist, he has completed the TOUR-Transalp and the TOUR-Trans Austria. His reportage trips from San Francisco to Sakai and 17 trips to the Tour de France with around 30,000 motorhome kilometres are also formative.

Most read in category Buying advice